I’ll admit that I tend to overanalyze things. I don’t view it as a positive or negative, more of just a part of who I am. Having that personality trait, I tend to ask questions of others that force them to ponder the same dilemmas that I face when traveling.
One of my favorite questions to ask frequent travelers is “What’s more important, the hotel or the destination?”
Of course, there’s more to the question than that. What I’m trying to find out is if they’ll visit a location just for an amazing hotel if there’s not much else there, or would they rather stay at a boring yet sufficient hotel at an amazing location.
Ben said what I’d expect from someone who’s traveled everywhere, “Why do you have to choose?” Go to an amazing hotel at an awesome location.
Sure, that’s an option for some. But what if the location you want to visit doesn’t have any luxury hotels? Or what if an amazing hotel is not close to anything else you’d want to see?
Tiffany’s response was that she’d stay in a hut if the location was stunning. I tend to agree with her. I’m way more about the location than the accommodation.
We’ve admittedly never stayed at a hut but we’ve stayed at some basic accommodations. When we visited Carlsbad Caverns, there’s not much in the form of luxury accommodations in the surrounding area.
We stayed at an average chain hotel, so average I can’t even remember if it was an IHG or Marriott property. I wasn’t there for the hotel.
Another place where the hotel was outdated was our stay at the Thunderbird Lodge at Grand Canyon.
Not the lap of luxury. It was a room and it was clean. More important to us was the view just outside our room.
That tends to be the case at many of our National Parks. Great views, average hotels. Now there are exceptions to that rule, like the Ahwahnee Hotel in Yosemite, but still, those hotels are grand but not luxury.
Don’t get me wrong, if we’re traveling and have the opportunity to stay at a really nice hotel, I’ll take advantage of the opportunity. It’s just never the REASON that I’ll go somewhere.
It’s the same as why we’re not the resort hotel type. I don’t want to stay at my hotel for the entire trip. Even if they do have an amazing pool or fabulous restaurants. I travel to see places, not to see hotels.
What’s your opinion? Location, hotel or only somewhere with both?
Like this post? Please share it! We have plenty more just like it and would love it if you decided to hang around and get emailed notifications of when we post. Or maybe you’d like to join our Facebook group – we have 13,000+ members and we talk and ask questions about travel (including Disney parks), creative ways to earn frequent flyer miles and hotel points, how to save money on or for your trips, get access to travel articles you may not see otherwise, etc. Whether you’ve read our posts before or this is the first time you’re stopping by, we’re really glad you’re here and hope you come back to visit again!
This post first appeared on Your Mileage May Vary